Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (1589)	1/18/2001 11:59:22 PM
From: cosmicforce	Respond to of 82486

[Ooops. This was to Bald Eagle] I can understand not being interested in same gender sex (I'm certainly not). I can understand that you may even be revolted by sex acts done by others (I am). That's all well and good. I'm disgusted by many foods people eat. However, I'm not going to say that Federal Inspectors reject cuts of meat that I find unappealing (that'd be all since I'm a vegetarian). So, what is the compelling legal, moral, or other interest you have in the relationships and potential acts other people choose to embrace? Nothing that I can see. Leave it alone. It's funny that you embrace guns (which people who've had love ones shot probably feel is really disgusting). You want your right to this preserved absolutely. However, you seem to be completely insensitive to something that is central to people's real happiness - the lifetime commitments to other people. I just don't get this. Guns are more important than promoting loving, committed relationships by consenting adults?