To: cheryl williamson who wrote (40619 ) 1/19/2001 6:06:26 PM From: craig crawford Respond to of 64865 >> We've gone through this b.s. before in 1998. These analysts are completely full of sh**. << Actually the number cuts on SUNW don't bother me. It's the comments about Sun becoming the next Dell and comments about how Sun's growth days are over etc. etc. I am a little surprised that the street took the lower guidance so hard. After all, many of these analysts have been saying in the last couple of weeks that SUNW is going to have to lower it's growth rate. Same thing with Cisco, which has tough comparisons ahead like Sun. Cisco and Sun numbers have to be guided down, but I thought everyone knew it and it was already priced in. I expected analysts to trim a few pennies off the estimates but then say with SUNW down 50% and with the better outlook for the second half etc, the 30-35% growth is still worth paying a premium for considering the alternatives in techland out there. The way I see it, you can pay 30 times for MSFT now and get 10-15% growth, or you can pay a little more for SUNW and get 30-35% growth. The only other alternative is to buy tech that appears to be insulated from the slowdown like EMC, BRCD, JDSU, CIEN etc, but you will have to pay 70-150 times earnings for that. No thanks. >> My advice is this: take advantage of the stock at this great discounted rate, you'll never see it again << Well I bought today at 34 (ouch), 33 1/2 (yikes) 32 1/2, 31 1/2 and 30 1/2. So I have a full plate of SUNW now, but that's my only position. I cashed out of the last of my other positions this a.m. I am bullish on SUNW's prospects for the future as long as the economy does well, but it's quite apparent after today that SUNW has some serious base building to do. Obviously the range of 33-40 was too optimistic and Perhaps SUNW will trade in the high 20's to 35 range for a while. It would be nice to see it stay above 30.