SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BigBull who wrote (60119)1/21/2001 10:45:25 AM
From: Earlie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
BB:

I agree with the basic idea, and in fact made the bet in December that Greenspan could not provide a rate reduction at that time as he needed to get Europe onside. (I was right). That said, so far, inspite of serious discussions with the other parties, (a), the U.K. has said "no rate cuts" (at least, for now), and (b) Germany hasn't moved or indicatd that it will. The key is to recognize that the U.S. is not in control of this situation. Greenie can't reduce that interest rate differential and without European coperation (i.e., European rate cuts), he is snookered.

If they cooperate, then the game does get extended. There are plenty of reasons why Germany (the key in my opinion) might not want to play ball, and it is well recognized that France would like nothing better than to see the U.S. dollar displaced as "The" international reserve currency.

Best, Earlie



To: BigBull who wrote (60119)1/21/2001 9:30:43 PM
From: Archie Meeties  Respond to of 436258
 
If rate cuts are worldwide and coordinated, there would be little point in being short any currency. But there's been no coordination yet, just surprises.

Total EU exports of goods to the US represent less than 10% of intra-European (EU15) trade.

Check your PM.