Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Vari-L (VARL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bosco who wrote (2638)	1/20/2001 7:42:01 PM
From: Labrador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2702

>>Naz listing is based on rules. It delisted VARL based on the company's failure to file financial statements with SEC on a timely basis. << Haven't even read the financials yet. I believe that you only know part of the story. It's due "in part" to the not filing financial statements. Read my prior post. Message 15033486 Too bad that management is not candid with owners. Too bad that management is not yet being accountable to its owners. You don't want to know what I think. They will be accountable to shareholders, but it will take about 1-2 years. sur·rep·ti·tious (sûrp-tshs) adj. Obtained, done, or made by clandestine or stealthy means. Acting with or marked by stealth. See Synonyms at secret. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Middle English from Latin surreptcius, from surreptus, past participle of surripere, to take away secretly: sub-, secretly; see sub- + rapere, to seize; see rep- in Indo-European Roots.] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- surrep·titious·ly adv. surrep·titious·ness n.

To: Bosco who wrote (2638)	1/20/2001 9:36:30 PM
From: John J. Riley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2702

Bosco, I hope you prove to be right because it would be to my benefit. However, the NAS is having lot of problems these days. More than 650 companies were delisted in 2000, a record number, for falling under $1 in price. They are trying to improve their image and taking another chance with likes of a VARLE, with its current BOD, is at best a long shot. I have seen other companies that have been delisted for much cleaner reasons ie, price below $1 that took 3 or 4 years to get back. BTW, I really have no real ill feelings for Pappas. As a matter of fact, I think he has probably done a good job. It's just that I'm frustrated after what I've been through with these inept management. His thanking the shareholders for "Hanging in there" well let's be honest. The only reason I hung in there was when I went to sell the stock it was halted, then delisted. I didn't get a chance to get out until it was to late. Thanking me for hanging in there only reminded me of that fateful day. Yes, I am bitter and would like to see justice done. But I bet the bums will skate.