Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nihil who wrote (58321)	1/22/2001 1:05:36 PM
From: nasdaqian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

Are you saying the emf will penetrate conduit, earth, poles, etc. sufficiently to run the I.R.? What is the maximum distance this I.R. needs can be from the 110 ac cable? Again, this "solution" might be ok for you and a few others in limited locations but it isn't a solution to the infrastructure problem at all. And I'm talking about broad use of EVs, not just yours or mine.

To: nihil who wrote (58321)	1/24/2001 9:09:50 PM
From: JF Quinnelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

SCARF? Does this mean it would be desirable to live near high tension lines?

To: nihil who wrote (58321)	1/24/2001 10:47:56 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

But you can't steal that force without paying for it. You can't steal energy that they generate. It's just like satellite movie transmissions that are scrambled. You can't "unscramble" their energy for your own purpose without payment. After all that energy is the "commercial content" of those power lines. And any unauthorized attenuation of that energy that would subvert that commercial purpose would be theft.