SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan3 who wrote (125806)1/22/2001 11:56:15 PM
From: Bald Eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
OT:
Subject: Social Security

Social Security

Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions in this
election year.

Our Senators and Congressmen do not pay into Social
Security, and, of course, therefore they do not
collect from it. Social Security benefits were not suitable
for persons of their rare elevation in society. They
felt they should have a special plan for themselves. Many
years ago they voted in their benefit plan.

In more recent years, no congress person has felt
the need to change it. After all, it is a great plan.
For all practical purposes their plan works like this. When
they retire, they continue to draw their same pay until
they die, except it may be increased from time to
time by the cost of living adjustments

For example, former Senator Bradley, and his wife,
may be expected to draw $7,900,000.00, with Mrs. Bradley
drawing $275,000.00 during the last year of her life.
This is calculated on an average life span for each.

Their cost for this excellent plan is $"0", nada, zilch.
This little perk they voted in for themselves is
free to them.

You and I pick up the tab for this plan.
This fine retirement plan funds come directly
from the General Funds. Our tax dollars at work!
Social Security, which you and I pay into every
payday for our own retirement, with an equal
amount matched by our employer, we can
expect to get an average of $1,000.00 per month
from our Social Security plan. Or, we would
have to collect our benefits for 68 years and
1 month to equal the Bradley's benefits.

Imagine for a moment that you could structure a
retirement plan so desirable that people would have
extra amounts deducted from their pay to enhance
their own personal retirement income. A retirement plan
that worked so well,that Railroad Employees, Postal
Workers, and others who were not in the plan would
clamor to be included.

This is how good Social Security could be, if only one
small change were made. That change would be to jerk
the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan out from under the
Senators and Congressmen. Put them into the Social
Security plan with the rest of us. Then watch how
fast they would fix it!!!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed will be
planted, and maybe good changes will evolve.



To: Dan3 who wrote (125806)1/23/2001 2:47:29 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 186894
 
Alibi Dan - Re: "AMD has very clean, directed, strategy to ship its processors on a DDR platform that looks like its going be low cost, high performance, and the next industry standard. "

And don't forget - it locks up when it gets warm !!!

firingsquad.gamers.com

"With our 133MHz 1.2GHz Athlon however, we achieved mixed results. While we had moderate success at 133MHz (9.0x133) two weeks ago with this CPU, we were unable to break 115MHz (9.0x115) with the same CPU last week. Two weeks ago the system ran pretty well at 133MHz, we were able to run a full suite of benchmarks at that bus speed for the KT7A-RAID review. However, last week the system would lock up after 30-45 minutes of testing. "

Re: "The first iteration of SDRAM and P4 most likely won't be pretty. "

AthWipers with DDR and locking up is your idea of pretty, eh?

Paul



To: Dan3 who wrote (125806)1/23/2001 4:15:16 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dan, <Given the costs and production constraints of P4, Intel's cash flow needs, and the performance limits of P3, yes, I think AMD is largely immune from pricing pressure from Intel.>

Then according to your logic, Intel won't have to drop prices any, given that AMD is "immune" from pricing pressures. Guess we won't be seeing the huge "crash" in ASP like Intel originally predicted. ;-)

Tenchusatsu