SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (125834)1/23/2001 1:24:30 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony, <if LDT got anywhere vs. Infiniband.>

I don't think anyone really gets it. LDT, Infiniband, PCI-X, etc. are all targeting different areas of the system. It's not an either-or proposition: I can envision systems which efficiently incorporate all three standards at the same time.

Of course, that's not going to stop the supporters of one technology from lift up their standards as the "Great Unifying Standard." NGIO was going to be it. Then Infiniband. Now it's LDT. I've heard it all before.

Tenchusatsu



To: Tony Viola who wrote (125834)1/23/2001 2:18:23 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
Tony - re: ". That would be the ant-rubber tree plant case, as Frank sang, of all time if LDT got anywhere vs. Infiniband."

AMD announced the LDT = Long Delay Time - almost 15 months ago.

The latest road map I saw shows that the LDT won't even be part of any AMD system until the Hamster Series - which means about 18 months from now - assuming they can get it to work at all.

Paul


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News