Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rolatzi who wrote (85141)	1/23/2001 2:41:22 PM
From: cnyndwllr	Respond to of 95453

Gotta go. Yawl (y'll? WHAT WAS THAT?) solve this for me while I'm gone, would ya. In the spirit of my home state, this evening I expect to return home to cheap and available power, hopefully at a greatly reduced cost. Ed PS Big Dog, are you living next to a dog in heat? Is it making you crazy? I have solar panels for the summer and wood stove coils to my water heater in the winter. Don't suggest a house by house energy tax. These crazy people out here may go with it.

To: rolatzi who wrote (85141)	1/23/2001 2:52:47 PM
From: AltLar	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 95453

I don't quite understand why so many are saying they don't think CA is paying its fair share of the energy bill. Due to the fact that Pete Wilson and the CA utilities hamstrung themselves by legislating against being able to buy gas/electricity on the futures market, CA has been buying on the spot market and hence shipping big buckets full (as Carl Sagan used to say billions and billions) of dollars out of state. That's why PGE and SCE are facing BK. There has been a massive shift of assets from CA to other states. So why are so many suggesting the other states are getting the short end? Larry