SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude who wrote (6494)1/24/2001 8:38:30 PM
From: mightylakers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 196628
 
No, there's no need for 95/1x dual ASIC.

The so called compatibility in CDMA2000 means

A CDMA2000 mobile station can operate in both CDMA2000 and IS-95 system. A CDMA2000 system can receive mobile station for both CDMA2000 and IS-95 mobile station.

Although a CDMA2000 mobile station operate in a 95 system will be subject to the service capability that system can provide.

Hope that helps.



To: Claude who wrote (6494)1/25/2001 7:57:29 AM
From: Eric L  Respond to of 196628
 
<< be demand for phones with dual asics - IS-95+1X? >>

As Lakers pointed out, it is a single ASIC, and the great forward backward compatibility of cdmaOne/cdma2000 remains a great feature of the cdma family. The migration path for cdmaOne carriers is much less convoluted than for competitive technologies.

- Eric -


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News