Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stribe30 who wrote (130735)	1/24/2001 11:26:57 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573433

Scott, I guess you are misunderstanding me. I am for accommodating all of the people of the earth, and see the damage on the environment as an unfortunate price that has to be paid, until we figure out how to accommodate the 6+ billion people with lower toll on the environment. There doesn't seem to be any humane way of reducing the population. Those who think that the humans cause too much damage to the environment, and that the situation is unacceptable, and has to be solved NOW, I just hope they go through their (invalid) argument to it's conclusion. I suggested one possible conclusion to their argument, that is, if they think there are too many people, and the environmental impact of all these people is too great, I hope they do something about it. As far I am concerned, I am a believer in human ingenuity. I am an optimist and I think these problems related to the environment will be solved, and Earth will accommodate all these people with ease. Joe PS: There you go with your tactics of being offended. Do you guys take courses in this?