SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: YlangYlangBreeze who wrote (3044)1/25/2001 12:20:25 PM
From: Greta Mc  Respond to of 82486
 
No thoughts on your post, but is anyone watching Robert Byrd right now?

He seems to be rambling...very sad.



To: YlangYlangBreeze who wrote (3044)1/25/2001 12:37:54 PM
From: Solon  Respond to of 82486
 
Here are some thoughts, as you invited: Firstly, I do understand Admin.'s unwillingness to carve the rule book in granite when behaviour is situational, and the "appropriateness" of speech and behaviour is not a static singularity, but is contingent or qualified by the set and the setting.

What rules then should guide our own behaviour? When I am on a thread, I consider the nature of the topic, the intent indicated by the thread intro, and the general attitude of the posters. This gives a general sense as to how much informality will be encouraged or tolerated. Given the kind of party that is being hosted, then, I apply my own standards as I would within my own home. We all know when people are disrespecting our homes and our other guests. Whe people are indiscriminate or unfair in their criticism; When they repeatedly try to mislead in order to prevent a rational discussion that looks seriously at all the facts; When they attack people instaed of ideas, and then generalize that attack to groups--be they racial, idealogical, or others. In short, when they engage in behaviours that rationally and intuitivelly discomfort the others--not because of the opinion expressed--but because of the inability to be civil in a group setting.

Not everyone will invite guests of varied opinions into their homes. Some people have sufficient knowledge and exposure to ideas for their own interests or needs, and that is their business. But I think the invitation of guests to ones home carries with it the obligation to be courteous, respectful, and fair minded. The guests should not be belittled, mocked, ganged on, isolated, or made unwelcome. The guests have the same obligations.

I don't suggest prudery, or artificial interaction; Only that outright viciousness, childlishness, hatefulness, and so forth, are traits that are unacceptable in a civil arena. Of course, I am rushing out, so my thoughts are not processed very well; But that is just a general statement of feeling...YYB (and I just said your name out loud, as I do when I read your posts because it makes me laugh. If you heard the way I say it, you would laugh, too!)



To: YlangYlangBreeze who wrote (3044)1/25/2001 1:15:45 PM
From: bosquedog  Respond to of 82486
 
brunching.com

note to self: I thought this link was funny.<G>