SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Constant Reader who wrote (3137)1/25/2001 5:22:20 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I was very careful not to use names. Did Toscano use names? I don't see how you can be suspended when you don't identify people. That would be just too stupid and petty- especially for something that is now common knowledge.



To: Constant Reader who wrote (3137)1/25/2001 5:28:47 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Really?
Did he use names?
FOr heaven's sake. EVeryone KNEW what was going on -- it was posted here.
This is like convicting the homeowner for shooting the burglar.
Well, it would be a first for me. I;m always such a good girl. And maybe I could get some real work done.
Shootie will make a ton on his pool.



To: Constant Reader who wrote (3137)1/26/2001 5:56:33 PM
From: hobo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I understand toscano was just suspended for being a bit too specific while explaining the reason for Poet's suspension. I suggest you might need to reword your post.

just a clarification: (no argument is intended)

and your "understanding" must have come from ?....

evidently, you must be constantly reading beyond what the actual posts say... since to this moment i do not know why i was suspended. (nor i ever recall stating "why Poet was suspended" let alone "being specific about --anything--)

maybe you have the post that my memory escapes and indeed i explained in that post anything about the reasons why Poet was suspended.

if that is case please point me to it, so i can understand why is it that i was suspended myself.

would you be referring to this perhaps ? :

Message 15243778

even then... i was not being "specific as to the reasons why Poet was suspended"



To: Constant Reader who wrote (3137)1/26/2001 7:07:06 PM
From: Constant Reader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
As Toscano has pointed out, it appears that this post by me was inaccurate:

Message 15247212

I apologize to anyone who relied on this information.