SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ian@SI who wrote (2689)1/26/2001 12:43:42 AM
From: Miljenko Zuanic  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
<<Those researchers felt that the efficacy is VERY conservatively stated and that the morbidity / mortality benefits are quite clear and will prove to be exceedingly positive in ongoing trials.>>

ALXN reported for CABG group, bolus + infusion:

<<Additionally, at 30 days, pexelizumab reduced the death rate from 1.9% in the placebo group to 0.4%, or a relative reduction of 79% (p=NS). >>

Did they commented what were death reasons? MI?
Why is 80% reduction -> p=NS?

Miljenko



To: Ian@SI who wrote (2689)1/26/2001 8:49:50 AM
From: Biomaven  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 52153
 
Ian,

I still maintain a substantial ALXN long position, and so I believe in the company and the drug.

Here's another attempt at looking at these results:

1. On a superficial level (which is where pretty much all the posted analysis and comment has been) the results are excellent.

2. If you look a little deeper, there are some holes. Only one of the two arms worked. They missed their pre-determined endpoints. They engaged in subgroup analysis. Their PR skated over all these issues.

3. At a still deeper level, however, the results are very encouraging. I basically buy the company's analysis of what the trial has showed.

So much for the trial. Now let's factor in the shorts. I felt that the shorts would blow-up and magnify the items in 2 above. So far I've been wrong on that, and so my timing in parting with part (20%) of my shares was wrong. I wouldn't be surprised if we see some further attacks, however.

Peter