SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bargain Hunter who wrote (18662)1/26/2001 12:09:27 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Thanks for the info, I am still trying to guess what the next quarter will be, it depends so much on the consumer's mood, that I am not sure if my numbers make sense at all.

Zeev



To: Bargain Hunter who wrote (18662)1/26/2001 12:56:55 PM
From: Ausdauer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 60323
 
Hunter,

Cash

I believe SNDK paid $20 million to Tower in Q3. The remaining
$55 million will be paid when certain "milestones" are accomplished.
One can assume these milestones include secured financing from the
Israeli goverment (already announced) and a secured line of credit
(just announced), as well as secured interest of other industry partners.

I thought Frank Caleroni mentioned a $95 million dollar cash payment
to the FlashVision JV this past quarter. This likely accounts for
the decrease in cash on the balance sheet.

OEM vs. Retail vs. Industrial Revenues

I will take whatever criticism people wish to dole out about the
"anecdotal evidence" I posted over the holiday season regarding
retail business. In the final analysis retail sales, such as those
cards sold at BestBuy, Circuit City and Amazon.com, was up 50% Q-over-Q.
Thus, I believe our observations were actually correct. During the
c.c. Eli mentioned that many retail outlets have "bare shelves" and
will likely be reordering, albeit cautiously, once other electronics
inventories (such as PC's left unsold from Q4) begin to move. I am
not sure of the dynamics of selling down inventories of unrelated items,
but some stores must keep a running tally of total inventories
within a product group, in this case consumer electronics, before reordering.

(It doesn't make sense that you would fail to restock a popular item
until less popular items are out the door unless there were more
globular budgetary constraints on the store.)

Industrial vs. OEM

I believe industrial customers are primarily telecom infrastructure
players. I don't believe they fall into the OEM group. It was very
disappointing to learn that OEM orders at the end of December are
what hurt us most during Q4. I and others have complained at what
little recognition SanDisk seems to garner via OEM relationships
given that most of the flash cards are private labelled with SanDisk
mentioned only in fine print on the back side of the cards. Also,
I still don't understand how SanDisk is able to manufacture 8 and 16 MB
CompactFlash or 4 and 8 MB MultiMedia cards at with a comptetitive
cost structure given that virtually all of SanDisk's manufacturing
is 256 megabit and going on 512 megabit. Lexar's CEO mentioned
the posibility of selling OEM's controllers and forcing them to find
card assemblers. I can't see anyone agreeing to those terms. In any
case, some OEM's were stuck with an abundance of bundled cards and
did not reorder in December. The Lexar earnings warning c.c. implicated
Kodak. (Eli tactfully withheld this kind of information.)It is
possible that despite the strong holiday digicam sales that certain players
lost market share. Kodak is almost certainly one of them. More popular
players such as Sony, Fuji Olympus, Nikon and Canon likely eroded Kodak's
market share. Thus, if Kodak is a major SanDisk OEM, which I believe is
the case, their failure to deliver likely hurt SNDK in Q4. Other contributing
OEM's may include second tier MP3 players (I-Jam, Compaq and MiniJam)
who bundled 16 and 32 MB MultiMedia Cards with their products.
They likely ordered cards in Q2 and Q3 of last year, but then failed
to follow through with reorders during Q4 due to competition from
players like Rio! Multimedia,...

We are in a rut.

I think we are in a rut now until SanDisk finds a way to work down its
outstanding inventory. Because the majority is reportedly raw materials
they should have the freedom to redistribute this flash stockpile
over the product line. I hope that the guidance that Eli gave is accurate.
It will take upto two quarters to work down the inventory. If things
don't turn around it would seem logical that SNDK would reduce future
orders for flash from UMC. I would also expect that they would begin
paring down UMC shares (if market conditions allow) and shift production
needs to FlashVision. I am actually looking forward to this type
of transition.

Aus