Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JRI who wrote (41636)	1/26/2001 1:39:02 PM
From: Paul Shread	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

What the heck does Rivlin know? I assume that was just speculation. She's not on the board anymore.

To: JRI who wrote (41636)	1/26/2001 1:44:14 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

Thanks, that would explain the bounce since uncertainty is being taken away but these valuations still aren't supported by a zero growth rate. We KNOW for fact that the PC sector is dead, Cell phones are dead, Fiber optic buildouts are dead and yet we still have valuations like this was the beginning of the tech boom of 1995. I have no idea when this will end but I do know now that it won't be able to be done gracefully. It is going to end with a deafening boom, or should I say burst. Like the post earlier about QCOM. It is an echo of those that were in love with LU, DELL, MU AMZN, YHOO, PCLN etc etc etc. Two quarters of declining revenue, slowing earnings and always an excuse as to why. It always ends the same, only the ticker symbols change. God Bless America. EDIT - That sounds more harsh than I meant. I meant excuses from teh company, not the ones in the stock. I received the same kinds of posts about the above stocks and most recently NTAP when it was repeating the routine. Just got a call, have to go to work. Do I hear NDX 20,000 by 4:00? <g> Good Luck, Lee