Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (17274)	1/26/2001 2:29:15 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24042

There are still many doubters. That is technically a very bullish indicator. Many buyers have " buyers' paralysis right now ". Are unable to focus on the benefits of tax reduction because they have been brainwashed against lowering taxes by 8 years of Clinton-Gore rhetoric. Let us not forget: Clinton came in 8 years ago promising a tax cut and instead we got the biggest tax increase in 30 years. The result? A surplus, which now they want to spend. On a drug plan...or whatever. The first foot through the door of another expensive entitlement - social program. The first Medicare plan was going to cost 300,000,000 dollars. It is now a ......??? 100 billion program? ( help me here ). Why? Because Exhorbitant taxation is at the base of every re-distributionist system from the Communist to the Socialist to the " US Democratic " system. If the concept of taxation to achieve equality fails, then the whole " raison d'etre ", reason to be for the Democratic party is gone. I do not blame the Democratic party alone. I believe the Republican Party in the US has committed similar atrocities of over taxation and redistribution. They where " Republican " in name only , George Bush Sr. was an example of that: "read my lips, no new taxes ". He lacked the fortitude of his convictions, TA

To: michael97123 who wrote (17274)	1/27/2001 11:21:24 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24042

Greensapn said in JAN. 1999 :" He prefers Tax Cuts to More Spending: Greenspan: " Well, as I've said many a time —and some of your colleagues have repeated my mantra— that is, I would, one, prefer that we keep the surplus in place. If that proves politically infeasible, cutting taxes is far superior to spending, as far as the long-term stability of the fiscal system and the economy is concerned ". [Emphasis added.] (Transcript of Senate Budget Committee, January 28, 1999.) mediaresearch.org The networks distorted Alan Greenspan’s opposition to tax cuts, ignoring how if the alternative is more spending, "then I very strongly support tax cuts." mediaresearch.org . . "Cut Taxes, If Surplus Cannot Be Saved," Greenspan Says Wednesday, January 20, 1999 google.com TA