SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (88911)1/27/2001 4:38:01 PM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike,

The serious horse racing season is pretty much about to start.

I'm giving serious thought to stepping up my wagering level.

Over the last 5 years I've made a profit of over 40% on every dollar I wagered. Granted, I don't bet all that much in dollars or races so the sum is not particularly meaningful. But nonetheless the sample size is large enough when backed by the 5 prior years to give consideration to playing more seriously.

In the 5 years prior I had very mixed results and barely broke even most years. But there were two major contributors to those lackluster results.

1. I was wagering widely different amounts on individual races. I was betting a lot more on high probability (lower priced) horses than on longer shots. With low probability horses, the possibility of long losing streaks is very high. I was trying to put some stability in the overall results for psychological reasons. I was also operating under the assumption that my skill with both categories was equal. The results indicated that I wasn't all that much better identifying "value" favorites than the public. Yet that's where my biggest bets were.

2. I often made "saver" exotic wagers on some of the longer priced horses. Those tickets probably had a negative expectation. At a minimum they had a worse expectation than simply betting the horse to win. So they hurt my results. Pretty dumb to bet the underlay favorite over your 8-1 good value, but I did it all too often.

It was only after relentless frustration (and the help of a successful bettor) that I finally realized how much my betting sucked. About 5 years ago or so he urged me to do a few specific studies on my results. When I did, I found my mistakes. On that back data I had somewhat similar results to what I am getting now by simply making flat bets, not betting the short priced horses, and avoiding the exotic savers.

I'm not going to put a real lot of time into it. Still a weekend warrior, but it's time to step up the action. :-)

Wish me luck!

Wayne



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (88911)1/27/2001 6:29:18 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
I agree with this fellow concerning a good part of the BLS statistics (productivity, CPI and PPI are defintely whatever the statisticians want them to be) -- it's not so much that they are lies -- but just that they don't tell you anything useful or real about the economy.

Even deflators for specific industries/sectors (which I spent a lot of time looking at in a former job) are rife with problems

mises.org