SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (3724)1/27/2001 8:33:30 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 82486
 
That wasn't "the entire RWET."
All right, I exaggerated a little. OTOH:
(1) after those 3 posts, it went to PMs. Neither you nor I know what happened at that point.
(2) that whole affair was brought to an early termination by Poet's suspension. Who knows what would have happened had it continued.
So maybe I didn't exaggerate. The TOU are vague enough and general enough that anyone who has been on SI for any length of time will violate them- -at least in someone's opinion.

All that X sexual stuff was bad, bad, bad. You know that perfectly well, dude.
I won't argue that and I won't defend those posters or their posts. One of the advantages of current circumstances is that such posters will get knocked up the side of the head.



To: E who wrote (3724)1/27/2001 9:25:25 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I'm not going to go back and try and find the post, but it was something about me maybe being like a Jo? Little Women stuff? Never read it. Or saw the movie. I am assuming the comparison is all good. but for that "doughy" thing X said. I am pastey at times. But never doughy.