Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Kim who wrote (23805)	1/28/2001 12:28:15 AM
From: The O	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28311

old news? look in top right hand corner infospace.com O

To: Bob Kim who wrote (23805)	1/28/2001 4:45:27 PM
From: Bosco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28311

Hi Bob - my "better trained" comment is tongue'n cheek <G>. ML originaly analyst [offhand forgot his name,] who subsequently moved over to WIT, had a price target of $50 when Blodget made his outrageous $400 prediction. Subsequently, ML hired Blodget for that guy's job. ML is looking for flash and Blodget probably belongs there <VBG>! That is why I mentioned the Prince <GG> in our prior exchange. I don't know if there is a pattern, but, maybe I am defending ML in a backhanded fashion <GGG>, people shouldn't be surprised by the flipflop. In the end, criticism notwithstanding, ML is in the business of making money. And people like us should watch our own wallet. Use these outfits to our advantage. Sometimes, I listened to them. Sometimes, I used them as an contrarian indicator. Sure, I usually lost when I bet against them [quasi dealers of them all,] but I know blaming them is useless to my wallet. best, Bosco