To: Mike McFarland who wrote (464 ) 1/28/2001 1:01:21 AM From: Tomato Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1833 Thanks, Mike. So the bottom line is that the line in the 10-Q:" The Company expects to generate revenues in the future only if it is able to license its technologies" is misleading. Or at least it's misleading to me. Or maybe since they're not the company creating the cashflow, technically they're not the ones generating revenue? They're expecting revenue, but someone else is generating it? ??? Confusing language to me, and although it may be clear to others, I've found from experience that if I'm confused I'm usually not the only one. Too bad certain people on this thread (and others) like to attack people for asking what seem to me to be reasonable questions. This thread isn't exactly a lively one, and I figure it's valuable to some people to kick around facts even if it involves going over some old ground. One does tend to forget things over time, and since there's a general lack of news on KDUS, going over old ground isn't a bad idea. If one doesn't like it, one can always ignore it. After all, this thread doesn't belong to one person, nor does it need to adhere to his sensibilities does it? Funny, in that the person who reacted with hostility to my post posted something not so long ago about how he was incredulous that anyone should think him other than a perfect gentleman on SI threads. I find him an arrogant bully and think the way to deal with bullies is to fight back--as bullies are often cowards. Let's call a spade a spade. I've had PMs from more than one person commenting on the person in question has big personality problems. It's time for others to refuse to take crap from him.