SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ecommerceman who wrote (124087)1/29/2001 11:32:52 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
It is unreasonable to expect there can be little or no duress in the case of a woman who allows her own child to be murdered. Pregnant women are typically under quite a great deal of duress, even if they are so cavalier as to have five or ten abortions. This fact alone distinguishes them from the average murderer. So while the law should certainly turn its attention to women who become accomplices in the murder of their children, it should not typically turn upon them with the same force it would turn upon mass-murderers. The extenuating circumstances are typically greater in the cases of women who are accomplices in the murder of their unborn children relative to the average murderer. This is plain horse sense—buddy.

The true murderer, the mass murderer, the person who should be fried in The Chair, is not the woman who allows the murder of her child. It is the abortionist who actually does the murder, the fiend who actually profits, whose home is bought by the blood of innocent children.

***

I don’t think pro-lifers are being manipulated by the GOP. I think the GOP takes its position on abortion because it has been manipulated by pro-lifers. You apparently forget, there was a time when the GOP was hardly influenced by pro-lifers, and even today the GOP wishes the abortion issue would simply disappear. Indeed in 1996 the GOP worked hard to remove the pro-life plank from its overall platform. It failed because pro-lifers threatened to reject the GOP.

I assure you that where I am personally concerned my position on abortion has little to with the GOP. Abortion is murder of the purest form, and obviously so. Moreover, I am a fan neither of the GOP nor of Dubya and in fact I grow closer with each election cycle to forsaking my right to vote. But in this past cycle I was yet compelled to acknowledge that whether the GOP does anything of substance on abortion, it is still a substantially more reasonable party than the Democrat Party, and thus is worthy of my support.