Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pgerassi who wrote (130963)	1/29/2001 2:13:43 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1580351

"I said a limited missile defense system" I don't think there are all that many people who would oppose a small implementation. The problem is that this issue gets wrapped up with the Reagan concept of "an invincible shield" which is not a limited deployment. I personally feel that the chances of some crazed leader launching, oh two, missiles at the US is as close to zero as you can get, but that is an argument for another day. But for something to protect against the Cold War scenario of thousands of warheads coming over the poles, well, it ain't going to happen anytime soon. A much smaller scale system is not a real problem. I favor the research, but a full scale implementation is a really expensive night light... The probability of a small implementation doing what needs to be done is a whole lot higher for the money spent.