SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (9018)1/29/2001 5:57:27 PM
From: Quincy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34857
 
Uh, overlapping and hierarchies only stand a chance of helping you if a handset can see more than two base stations.

Are providers going to install extra base stations to enable you to triangulate your position? Doubting it.

Not because of the cost of the BTS itself, but because of challenges getting permission for an antenna site then leasing T1/E1 lines to the central controller plus the desire to build out coverage to start before backfilling the holes.

I believe Snaptrack and/or GPS is cheaper and offers unmatched coverage. Providers have no other requirement but to implement it in their web and 911 software then start raking in the cash.



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (9018)1/29/2001 11:08:47 PM
From: samim anbarcioglu  Respond to of 34857
 
Ilmarinen, you should keep in mind that the GPS signal is owned by the US government, and it is provided to the rest of the world on a gratis basis, and can be withdrawn and service denied at anytime when the US military decides (probably only in the event of conflict). Its primary purpose is to help our seagoing and airbound ships navigate, and our rockets deliver missiles into a pickle barrel across the ocean when we, or our friends elsewhere are threatened.

The interesting and sometimes useful commercial usage of the system that we have seen in the recent years is nothing but doodly squat when you ponder its real purpose.
regards,
sa