Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper - analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Soileau who wrote (261)	1/29/2001 10:56:50 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 2131

California can't be much worse than British Columbia under its current regime, i rank it right down there with the seedier parts of Africa and Asia ... couldn't believe it when one little speckie i hold for a radio project made a deal on gold claims in the Cariboo, i just groaned oh gawd not here ... well for a stock promotion it doesn't matter so much, but try building a mine should you actually pull nice cores - forget it. Square miles of forest have died to make the paper to print the BC Forest Practices Code with its amendments and the forms you have to fill out before passing wind within sight of timber ... you need a wheelbarrow to carry the basic rulebook around, no kidding. First stock i ever held was a BC copper play, Giant Mascot Mines ... LBJ's excellent adventure in Indochina made copper go up, gave me a four-bagger and doomed me to a life of chasing the next one ... but that was then, before the urban folk decided to dominate the rest of us. Political risk is a more accurate way to say it than country risk, it can vary so much within a nation ... the province of Québec is not so harsh on miners, for instance.