SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (9502)1/31/2001 1:24:08 AM
From: DaYooper  Respond to of 13572
 
you summed it up at the bottom of your post, I'm looking for 100 nothing more.

The GSM wireless heavyweights are rightfully lowering expectations considering they have saturated markets and nothing "new" to sell.

QCOM has several factors in it's favor that the GSM cartel does not. 1)Huge potential of amps networks now being upgraded to cdma in U.S. 2)New product cycle just beginning, 1x, and will get stronger throughout the year. 3)China orders will be placed and analysts will need to work those metrics into valuation models. 4)Nok will need to sign 3G license agreement soon -- even expected by Nok fans to happen this year.

QCOM's valuation will show no relationship to the projections made by GSM heavyweights. And no reason it should.

Rory



To: Boplicity who wrote (9502)1/31/2001 4:56:52 AM
From: techguerrilla  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 13572
 
I keep looking at SEBL, Greg

. . . . and have been doing so for many, many months. I ask myself why I don't have a little piece of that growing monster. It's just getting to be "buy" time. NTAP, SEBL, and QCOM seem like a nice trio. Too bad I didn't get back into QCOM in those low 70's. But who was to know that its guidance last week would be so splendid? The sector, though, just doesn't have any comprehensive power.

/john