SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (4145)1/31/2001 2:45:40 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 82486
 
On a related topic, I have a question. Can these agencies that can't promote abortion any more on US money provide sterilization services for women who absolutely want no more babies and still get U.S. dollars?

My understanding of the policy is that they could get US dollars for the sterilization only if they did not provide abortions at all.

Tim



To: Bald Eagle who wrote (4145)1/31/2001 6:22:16 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
How about saying we'll pay for this abortion, but you have to agree to get sterilized too. Pros and cons of that kind of policy? Any takers?

You won't get takers. Sterilization (voluntary) (given that "voluntary" is always relative) is a taboo topic.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News