SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems-Trading Strong Earnings Growth and Momentum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frederick Langford who wrote (3559)1/31/2001 8:03:17 PM
From: Jenna  Respond to of 6445
 
ESPD marketgems.com. moved up in the last few weeks, I'd be interested to see how this works out tomorrow which is still not indicative of how it will work out in the short / intermediate term.
Lets watch ESPD tomorrow.. and for the next few days..

-----
PRESS RELEASE: ESpeed Reports 4Q Results >ESPD


eSpeed Substantially Improves Profitability
Outlook for 2001; 2000 Revenue Tripled Versus 1999 Period; Fourth
Quarter Revenue Growth of 154% Over Previous Year

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 31, 2001--

EPS Exceeds Consensus Estimates by $0.06

eSpeed, Inc. (NASDAQ: ESPD), the leading interactive electronic
marketplace engine for business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce, today
reported record fourth quarter and full year 2000 results, and
substantially revised its profitability outlook upward for 2001.

Improved Profitability Outlook for 2001

The Company accelerated its profitability expectations to the third
quarter of 2001 from the previous fourth quarter guidance, subject to
seasonality factors and excluding non-cash charges. eSpeed
substantially improved its guidance for 2001 to net operating income
(loss) per share in the range of ($0.06) to ($0.08) in the first
quarter, ($0.03) to ($0.05) in the second quarter, $0.00 to $0.01 in
the third quarter and $0.02 to $0.04 in the fourth quarter. For the
full year 2001, the Company expects an annual net operating loss per
share in the range of ($0.04) to ($0.11), representing a $0.22 to
$0.29 improvement over the current consensus estimates.
Howard W. Lutnick, Chairman and CEO of eSpeed, Inc. commented on the
new outlook, "The success of eSpeed's business model has propelled the
Company toward profitability quicker than previously forecasted. We
have significantly improved our financial outlook for 2001 and now
expect to be net operating income positive by the third quarter of
this year. Our announcement today is a significant milestone for
eSpeed, and our shareholders."

2000 Revenues Tripled Over 1999 Period

eSpeed's revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2000
increased more than three-fold to $118.9 million over $38.2 million in
1999 (eSpeed commenced operations on March 10, 1999). The year-end
revenues were $41 million above the target set at the Company's
initial public offering in December 1999, representing a 50% increase
over the initial 2000 revenue target of $78 million.
Frederick T. Varacchi, eSpeed's President and Chief Operating
Officer said "We have surpassed our financial and business goals, with
our full year 2000 revenues far exceeding our expectations during our
IPO a year ago. Additionally, we have succeeded in leveraging our
technology to deliver 37 new products to the eSpeed system, making for
a total of 43 actively traded products on the system, surpassing our
initial goal of 40. The efficiency and overall performance of our
operations ensures eSpeed's continued growth for 2001 and beyond."
For the full year ended December 31, 2000, the Company reported a
net loss from operations of $27.0 million or ($0.52) per share. The
Company's full-year 2000 operating results exclude non-cash charges of
$33.4 million related to the provision of business partner securities,
associated with the formation of TradeSpark LP, as well as investments
by Dynegy Inc. and Williams in eSpeed and in connection with the
Municipal Partners transaction. Cash and cash equivalents were over
$122 million as of December 31, 2000.

Record Results for Fourth Quarter 2000 with Strong Outlook for the
Future

For the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2000, revenues were $35.6
million, an increase of 154% over the comparable period in 1999.
Fourth quarter fully electronic transaction revenues grew by more than
300% year-over-year to $25.7 million.
In the fourth quarter of 2000, eSpeed's total electronic volume was
$9.9 trillion, an increase of 26% over the previous quarter, with a
transaction count of 829,899. By comparison, for the same period, the
Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME)
and Eurex reported volume changes of 9.1%, 19.4% and (10.3%),
respectively.
The Company reported a net operating loss of $5.2 million, or
($0.10) per share compared to a net operating loss of $6.0 million, or
($0.13) per share for the same period last year. Furthermore, the per
share amount exceeded analysts' consensus estimates by $0.06.
Mr. Lutnick continued, "Our technology has created a frictionless,
digital environment that is attracting more users, generating more
volume and drawing further liquidity from other markets. Looking
ahead, our business shows even more promise. We are excited about
being the leader in the electronic trading arena and are committed to
further enhancing our trading technology to ensure that we remain on
the cutting edge of today's - and tomorrow's - marketplace needs."

About eSpeed, Inc.

eSpeed, Inc. operates multiple buyer/multiple seller real-time B2B
electronic marketplaces. eSpeed's suite of marketplace tools provides
end-to-end transaction solutions for the purchase and sale of
financial and non-financial products via the Internet or over eSpeed's
global private network. eSpeed currently provides the marketplace
infrastructure for more than 40 financial and non-financial
instruments, including most of the world's fixed income marketplaces.
eSpeed transacts over $150 billion of financial instruments daily and
is headquartered in New York City.



To: Frederick Langford who wrote (3559)2/1/2001 5:29:05 AM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6445
 
This article yesterday from Market watch is worth a second look :

( ITRU and HLIT may make small shorts at
some point today, and DIGL long at some point? ;-)

Will top-of-heap software stocks fall?

cbs.marketwatch.com.

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) - Who dares to disagree that the software companies that can slash Corporate America's business costs will reap the biggest stock rewards of 2001?

Not Wall Street analysts, it seems. They're still steering investors to a handful of software names they say are on the "must have" list for information-technology managers. Those companies include sales software maker Siebel, storage expert Veritas, transaction-processing applications company BEA Systems, and security wonk Check Point Software. See MarketWatch's Mike Tarsala report.

Today on CBS MarketWatch
Fed cuts interest rates by half a point
Stocks choppy after Fed slashes interest rates
AOL's Q4 profit comes in a penny ahead
AfterHours: MP3.com shares surge
Amazon.com shares turn lower
More top stories...
CBS MarketWatch Columns
Updated:
1/31/2001 5:40:56 PM ET

Only one of the 21 analysts who cover Siebel (SEBL: news, msgs), BEA (BEAS: news, msgs) and Check Point (CHKP: news, msgs) give any of the stocks less than a "buy" rating, according to Zack's Investment Research. Just two in 20 who cover Veritas (VRTS: news, msgs) give it less than a "buy."

Fundamentally, there are obvious reasons to love all four stocks. Each of the Wall Street darlings is a leader in its respective market. Each should return revenue growth rates at or above 50 percent in 2001. Earnings? FuhGet about it. We're talking about per-share profit growth near 40 percent for Siebel to as much as 118 percent for BEA this year.

But investors may want to take the analysts' software picks at their own peril, according to some money managers and investment gurus. Whatever the analysts say, it's not time to buy, according to the experts whose firms don't profit directly from stock sales to individual investors.

"They're outstanding companies, but they've already had such strong moves, and the price-to-earnings ratios are still up there," said Bill O'Neil, long-time investor and founder of Investor's Business Daily. "It's hard to see them suddenly taking off and leading the market."

There seems to be little added safety in the super software stocks, as their abnormally high prices could make them among the first shares that tank if recession threats get worse. The market's proven in the past 10 months that it won't spare valuable stocks such as Oracle (ORCL: news, msgs) and Sun Microsystems (SUNW: news, msgs) if the companies hint at slower growth rates.

Judging the expense of Siebel and the other stocks is in many respects a matter of opinion. But investors consider most software issues with price-to-earnings ratios above 100 to be expensive, says Kay Doremus with Banc of America Capital Management. While Check Point's PE ratio comes in under the threshold, the rest don't: Siebel has a PE of 102, Veritas has a PE of 115, and BEA's PE is a whopping 284.

The other multiple commonly used is a company's PE/Growth ratio, which also factors in earnings growth. The average software PE/G ratio is in a range from 1.5 to 2, Doremus says. But Check Point's is 1.7, Veritas and BEA come in at 2.4, and Siebel's stock is an even more pricey 2.7.

It's true that the best stocks in every industry trade at a premium. There's a price to pay for stellar growth, and current shareholders are among those that say Siebel and the rest can justify their cost.

O'Neil recommended so-called expensive stocks including Cisco Systems (CSCO: news, msgs) throughout the 1990s, while others passed on it. He said that his investment company's made money on stocks that trade with earnings multiples as high as 300.

So what of Siebel's multiples? The company seemingly should be on fund managers' A-list, right?

Siebel breezed through its December quarter with a two-fold sales increase. Pro-forma earnings that quarter increased 176 percent to $106 million from $39.2 million. The company's operating margin in the quarter increased to 27.2 percent, up from 20.2 percent in the year-ago quarter.

Long-term, Siebel's appears to be a poster child for all software companies. Its core market opportunity should grow to $12 billion in 2004 from $4.6 billion last year, according to International Data Corp. The company is expected to increase revenue 50 percent over the next three years. And Siebel continues to gain market share against hostile competitors.

All the others -- Veritas, BEA and Check Point -- also live up to their incredibly high growth rate standards. Veritas also is expected to increase revenue 50 percent for three years. BEA is expected to increase sales about 40 percent over the same period. Check Point can count on similar high growth rates.

But the question investors are asking increasingly is if the software companies can come through with expectations over multiple years. In light of overall tech market conditions, a growth rate hiccup in the near future could mean hell to pay for shareholders.

"These guys are totally off on their own," said Larry Seibert of Barrett Associates, who controls about $2 billion of investments for private client accounts.

There's a right time and a wrong time to pony up for pricey stocks, according to O'Neil. Now isn't the time, when it comes to software. He uses technical analysis, or stock price charting, as one of many factors to pick winners. And as of now, the charts are telling him to stay away from software.

Investors should buy strong-growing stocks that break out of a narrow trading range over week-long periods, O'Neil contends. But most software concerns, including Siebel, BEA, Veritas and Check Point, have yet to settle into a base trading range that will allow them to run up. Siebel has ranged from $100 a share to less than $50 a share in the past two months, and now trades near $71. BEA's shares range from about $81 to $41 over the same period, and now trade near $68. Veritas and Check Point's prices also showed volatility recently.

What's more, it's important to track money rotation, he contends. The big money is going to financial stocks and a handful of old economy names that recently have been overlooked. Software is out, -- at least for now.

There's a lot to be said for stocks that hold up in times of adversity. For that, Siebel and the rest get credit. The question is whether the stocks can keep going without a growth-related slip.

And if they do slip, is the overall tech economy worse off than the stock-touting analysts now are saying?

By Mike Tarsala, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 10:10 AM ET Jan 31, 2001 NewsWatch
Latest headlines
Get Alerted