SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Phoenix who wrote (47745)2/1/2001 4:37:35 PM
From: Eric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77400
 
Well I'm glad to see everyone has been beating this option thing to death!

Personally I like to see options. If done correctly: It encourages employees to perform. Which leads to company success if management has a good plan. Which leads to shareholders being happy.

I personally don't like dividends. Once a company starts to pay dividends I sell, no if ands or buts, I sell.

If I invested in a cyclical company like Boeing or GM then Dividends would be nice but I'd be taxed like mad and the kicker is that I would only hope for a double of my stock investment assuming that I "timed the market" correctly.( And that's over a 5-10 year average cycle)

There is a big difference between growth and value when it comes to investing.

The story at Disney is very telling when it comes to options. If Cisco tried to play that game I would be out in a heart beat!

Eric



To: The Phoenix who wrote (47745)2/1/2001 11:03:36 PM
From: Stock Farmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 77400
 
LOL. Gary, I am reminded of a thermometer ...

The only thing they may lose is opportunity costs

You have identified at least one thing that shareholders lose as a consequence of stock option grants :)

If there is at least one thing that someone can lose, then it is not possible they can lose nothing.

My comment about "one born every minute" was a reference to the greater fool.

John.