Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1898)	2/2/2001 12:44:11 AM
From: GraceZ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 46821

I went wireless for voice because it works out so much cheaper to have a couple of wireless phones sharing the same minutes. Long distance is included so you don't have those stupid access charges on each line, included voice mail and forwarding, caller ID, etc. I got rid of the PBX years ago and have been using standard two line phones in conjunction with the phone company doing the switching between stations (what they used to call Centrex, but they now call Custo-pak) What I was wondering is if you'd heard of anyone patching wireless service onto the wired installed phones. I haven't looked at using the DSL for voice.