Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : GEAC.....Canadian best kept secret -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: micromike who wrote (1520)	2/2/2001 10:13:28 AM
From: Dan Hamilton	Respond to of 1571

One the subject of software sales, I was talking to a broker I know who follows the tech sector quite closely. He likes the software companies for this year. Their research indicates that companies will be reducing hardware expenditures drastically this year (still postY2K hangover), and the bulk of IT budgets will go towards software.

To: micromike who wrote (1520)	2/2/2001 10:16:45 AM
From: Ally	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571

Mike, I'm not as troubled by the CFO leaving. In my previous life, I was in executive management. It is very common for the 2nd in command (CFO) to leave when the CEO leaves. A new CEO will frequently pick a CFO that agrees with his vision and direction of a company. When he leaves, any CFO worth his/her salt, would also look for a more progressive situation. It's not good for a professional career to stay around in a company that is battening down the hatches, or work with a new CEO having a different vision. I don't think there is anything untoward in the accounting arena. Remember, when Bergeron came in, he and the CFO had already written off all the "sins" of past management in the amount of over $200 million. It is very unlikely that there are any accounting irregularities within a year of a new CEO after a house cleaning of the books. I'm also not troubled by large contracts leaving. Most companies using outside data services from a firm like Geac (or SAP etc) have "cruising" management. They would be governmental agencies, non-profit organizations etc. Their management are not usually motivated to make huge decision like a data supplier change. The main problem with GAC was (1) the acquisition of JBA... clearly a sloven and unprofitable organisation and (2) the Y2K aftermath when companies lower their data processing budgets. I have a feeling from the conference call and news releases that the new CEO knows the remedy. It's quite straight forward that any experienced manager would know what to do... cut fat, remove debt, and improve earnings. Imagine GAC a year now, earning $1.00/share, and with no debt. At a minimum, stock price would be worth $8.00 (8 times earnings). Then, its time to add the sizzle... acquiring new line of credit... make strategic acquisitions... revamp the old enterprise system into today's technology and database system.