Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: REW who wrote (44497)	2/2/2001 11:06:56 AM
From: d_r	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

BOB: "It can be called what anyone wants..." It sounds like "Alice in Wonderland". The words have no meanings, one can assign any meanings to them. Please don't fall for the diabolical PH spin who probably was prompting SR during your talk. If SR is seriously saying what you are reporting, SR has two choices: 1) File an amended K-8, or pending that 2) Put everything in writing in his upcoming LETTER to shareholders. There has been enough deception in the past as you know too well. I believe this deception will continue as long as that the master spinner PH is there. I hope SR sees the light and removes PH from that position. If you can, ask SR to use one of the above options. Thanks. -- D_R

To: REW who wrote (44497)	2/2/2001 1:38:38 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

I'll wait for an amended 8-K rather than rely on interpretations of Roix's words and gestures. I'll wait for an amended 8-K with language in these SEC filings that doesn't leave so much room for ambiguity and uncertainty. Like I said I've read the filings and discussed them with both Kaston, and Henry. I've sent emails directly to Roix, and copied him on emails to Kaston, and Henry. To date he hasn't responded to me, nor should he make an attempt to rephrase and clarify with me individually or any specific shareholder. He should use both his CEO letter on the website and an amended 8-k to express more clearly or change language in the already released 8-K so all shareholders concurrently read official words and his words, not interpretations of his words and gestures of what some people may wish were the meanings of those words. Thus I'm not purposely misinterpreting anything. I've no issue with other items in the 8-K that have been overly dramatized by manipulators. There are a number of good items in the 8-K that have never been discussed for example the 1.250 mill preferred Series A shares ALL being converted and retired (ie. no further dilution from these preferred shares). Unfortunately, for me Bob, due to your past "embellishments", your transcriptions and interpretations mean very little to me. Thanks for your efforts but sorry, that's just the way I feel. z