Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (85281)	2/2/2001 1:41:08 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

I would like you to find one post where I said "buy Cisco", regardless of reasons. I was a CSCO employee for most of the years that I have participated on SI and was very careful to never make public recommendations on the stock. If you don't know the facts, don't go speculating on who may have said something. And I hope you get serious real soon, because I am taking your comments very seriously. Please provide proof of me saying that about Cisco or retract your conjecture.

To: Ilaine who wrote (85281)	2/2/2001 1:51:52 PM
From: accountclosed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

no problem here. i think we all suffer from the medium. hard to understand exactly where people are coming from here. i can't say that i ever understood where luc was coming from exactly <g>

To: Ilaine who wrote (85281)	2/2/2001 2:13:48 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

CobaltBlue, I hear that you may have some legal background. You know that I was a CSCO employee, perhaps even thought that I still was. What do you think the ramifications of your conjecture of me making recommendations on the stock? Do you think that I could be harmed by your statements? I do. I have discussed Cisco the company in the past, but while I was an employee, I made a very specific point to not talk about non-public information, the stock price or much else that was material. Your conjecture that it was me that made those statements is irresponsible. Fix it