Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Winter in the Great White North -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LeonardSlye who wrote (248)	2/2/2001 7:13:33 PM
From: ralfph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8273

TEK.B Plug her in and see what you get. Looking at the chart she should pull back to that 13.50 range on monday. But if you factor in the time of year and the little gap this morning she could go for a run into the 14. 50 range first. Then of course there is that recent 14.20 high which could be seen as resistance or support if she breaks through. Isn,t this fun. <ggg> ADX- I told yah it would take Moses to get her to run after the delay. Now I can hope for consolidation and a move upwards but the most likely direction is south on no news. GTT - The Chief says people are getting positioned.... I hope that means something good and I am not the guy "assuming the position".I must say this one does have potential. Sure wish it was another US video but I suspect the high will be a buck or two short. CPT- But has it got legs ? QBX- ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ, Hislop, Its slop I,m slop for buying his slop ? ITE-Back to the support level. If I load up will it hit a new low? Looks like the perfect cyclical stock for this thread. Regards ralfph I have not made a friggin trade all week.gotta do something to change that toot sweet.

To: LeonardSlye who wrote (248)	2/4/2001 1:36:36 AM
From: marcos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8273

'CGM.V' - you mean cmg.v right ... yes, someone else mentioned it since ... NB buying from Haywood, that's what Friday was all about there ... 'platinum-palladium properties', those are the magic words lately eh ... Rise's vpr.v was showing signs of stirring as well ...i've got two long tickers full of juniors on stockwatch, so many it's meaningless, the mind rebels, but here goes, adding cmg. Got anything you like for atial's contest? - Message 15295107 nt-tech.com.au - well this turned my brain to jelly in about thirty seconds, don't understand the terms nor anything about programming ... i'm curious about Metastock, whether a knowledge of progamming is necessary for it ... an offline friend says it is, otherwise you don't get the full benefit, but i have noticed his picks having spotty performance even before the tech market turned last spring, then he bought the dip on qcom above 100 on some 'strong buy signal', ouch. Your explanation of standard deviation makes sense sort of ... too many numbers for me ... "brother played with “Phil ‘n the Blanks”' - lol Another question, dumb maybe - i've been noticing on stockcharts.com where they have both 200-day and 40-wk moving averages - stockcharts.com .. that they're not the same ... there are five trading days per week, but i guess that doesn't allow for holidays ... still, it often makes more than a little difference to the numbers, and the most holidays possible in 40 weeks would be around six .. [?] ... ah, but the difference could also be explained because the weekly uses the close for the week as its data points, and being less data is cruder .. ? ... not that i think it matters, just didn't have anything better to worry about -g-