Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (125136)	2/3/2001 11:55:15 AM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The examples of your outspokenness you list are all about a week old. And they were all made before you engaged me, showing that you had nothing to do with changing my opinion on the matter. Whatever, I'll take your word about your personal past opinions. You don’t have to take my word when the facts are staring you right in the face. You seem to be taking two positions on the question of the morning after pill for rape victims in the same paragraph. First you say it should be unequivocally outlawed. But in the next sentence, you can tolerate it. If prolife policies are enacted into law, it'll have to be one or the other. False, and this is the problem from which narrow-minded people on both sides of this issue suffer. I do not compromise on principle, but will on practice. As long as the law acknowledges and works against the principle allowing the murder of innocent human life, I can be patient and allow abortions under some circumstances, even those I might personally reject. It is called rational compromise. If you're going to tolerate the morning after pill even though it murders an innocent life - what else will you tolerate? It depends upon the principles driving the issue and the extenuating circumstances surrounding it. You will need to try harder.