To: .Trev who wrote (5474 ) 2/6/2001 12:39:00 AM From: Teresa Lo Respond to of 8925 <font color=purple>Stock = Vehicle for Corporate Finance "...The idea is to figure out what the successful promoters are doing and do it too as a tag-along...Don't be surprised if the CDNX comes back to life this year....the signs are there for those who can see them." You are right in this regard. The key to know all about corporate structure. For example, in the "early" (two years ago) days of the Net stocks, it was not uncommon to see stocks that had 2-3 million share public floats. Now, this is amazing because the U.S. brokerage houses promoted these stocks to their clients, and had CNBC blaring around the world to tout as well. We talked about this extensively at my site, about how "tight" corporate structure is the "supply" part of the equation, and how research departments and the media create the "demand" part of the equation. I could not believe how small the floats were; in fact, most Canadian penny stocks had floats bigger than your average U.S. Internet stock - no wonder they were able to do the big parabolic runup! But the public does not understand this - they attributed it to the New Era. Of course, over time, the insiders started leaking stock out, as lockup periods ended, and more importantly, through stock splits the float was increased by 10 fold or more...and this means more supply. Eventually the stock was crushed under the weight of the amount of "paper" outstanding. I think people still do not understand this, as they think, somehow, that the game will be back on again, once the "bottom" is hit. They forget, alas, that the vehicle itself is not what it used to be. It's much harder to make MSFT, GE or Old Bessie go up than an IPO with no float! T.