SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kent Rattey who wrote (9102)2/3/2001 10:21:06 PM
From: Eric L  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34857
 
re: GPRS Update

Kent,

<< Achieving the theoretical maximum GPRS data transmission speed of 172.2 kbps would require a single user taking over all eight timeslots without any error protection. >>

172.2 kbps (unoptimized raw data speed) is as theoretical as 1xRTT at 614 kbps (and I wish CDG would update the !@#$%^& website). <g>

ISDN comporable effective throughput (with optimization) was the objective.

The article below is worth a read. It is pretty realistic, pretty current, pretty authoress, pretty well researched, reasonably accurate.

Hope the link works.

I just clipped the opening paragraph:

>> Scratching the GPRS Surface

1/31/2001
Wireless Networks Online
Paulo Di Maio

This is supposed to be the year of GPRS implementations, but the much-expected wireless 'midband' technology that was set out to achieve around 171 kps is catching on slowly. The wealth of trials and pilots initiated over the last twelve months all over Europe has greatly titillated the expectations of the markets. According to levelheaded observers, over-hyped prospects could be disappointing. <<

Full text here:

wirelessnetworksonline.com{DA10E171-F729-11D4-A770-00D0B7694F32}

- Eric -



To: Kent Rattey who wrote (9102)2/4/2001 2:10:12 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
>Achieving the theoretical maximum GPRS data transmission speed of 172.2 kbps would require a single user taking over all eight timeslots
>without any error protection.

Exactly, the original design criteria, known since late 70s.
(although one funny thing is that the FSK used in GSM has
an inbuilt forward error protection, although being
optimal for battery life is more important)

> Clearly, it is unlikely that a network operator will allow all timeslots to be used by a single GPRS user.

Not at all unlikely. (Sonera already gets rid of
the last telephone poles in Finland and installs
GSM based phones for the same monthly, etc fees as
for wired phones)

> Additionally, the initial GPRS terminals are expected be severely limited- supporting only one, two or three timeslots

Not limited at all, but exactly as the the system has been
designed, long time ago.

>The bandwidth available to a GPRS user will therefore be severely limited

No, it will be the same 200kHz used for ages.

> As such, the theoretical maximum GPRS speeds should be checked against the reality of constraints in the networks and terminals.

What do you mean "should be checked", it has been checked
long time ago. Many, many moons has passed since that,
much more than you have fingers and toes.

Ilmarinen.

P.S. Why is GPRS so difficult to understand, one only need
to process two-three factors at the same time, not even
all other users nor soft-hand-offs?
And the GSM operators have even more many, many moons of
actual dynamic field experience from their networks, huge
amounts of data. (Ever put a GSM phone in field
engineering mode??)