Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (125186)	2/4/2001 12:34:45 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I realize you're just trying to demonize me for disagreeing with you. Well. I was only making a joke. You demonize yourself when you defend barbarous unmitigated murder. You are wrong in charging that I have no compassion and ridicule it in others. On the contrary, I consider it a virtue. I admit I have little compassion for murderers though. You can have compassion for murderers and that's why I consider you a liberal. *GASP* That is the second time you've insulted me directly. Three times and you're out fella (pant pant). IMO if you find anyone with compassion for convicted murderers, you've found a true liberal. No, you've found a real human. When the life of a convicted murdered is rightfully taken by law, those who have no feeling about the sad event are liberal. Those who with compassion recognize that a solemn thing has ocurred are human. About the only murderer I can think of that I've felt compassion for was Karla Faye Tucker. You're almost a liberal! BRUMAR89 claims "IMO if you find anyone with compassion for convicted murderers, you've found a true liberal." I've only known a few liberals, most of them women and most of them quite good people with strong senses of compassion for others. Riiiight, but let a person have the misfortune of being in his mother's womb and he may be in quite a pickle because the liberal women have long been the first things to defend the "right" to puncture that person in the back of his head and suck out his brain. "Compassionate liberals" is just an empty term when liberals defend such barbarity. I've known a lot of conservatives and at least some of them are also compassionate though many are strangers to the concept. Conservatives do not defend the right to suck out a child's brain. If they do, then they are by definition not conservative because it was not an initial "right" in our society to suck out a kid's brain.