SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jcholewa who wrote (27369)2/4/2001 8:59:19 AM
From: stribe30Respond to of 275872
 
JC: I personally dont think you're "biased" against 1 or the other... I think you're trying to be balanced.. I've heard and seen others say you're AMD-friendly.. but that was more based on the comments on the user base then from you I think.. Either way, you cant win.. on the other hand, if you've got both camps saying you're biased towards the other.. you must be doing a good job



To: jcholewa who wrote (27369)2/4/2001 5:43:00 PM
From: milo_moraiRespond to of 275872
 
JC, I've always felt your Interest lies in Technology. I've always felt you enjoyed AMD's new inventions that keep INTC squirming.

Milo



To: jcholewa who wrote (27369)2/5/2001 7:43:47 PM
From: TGPTNDRRespond to of 275872
 
JC, Re: <could one of you fellows kindly explain to this person that I am, in fact, not ... er ... an "Intelabee", as you folks call it?>

Yes, I think I can. Pass on his email & I'll give it a try.

tgptndr@aol.com

tgptner



To: jcholewa who wrote (27369)2/5/2001 8:36:39 PM
From: combjellyRespond to of 275872
 
JC, everyone knows you are an Intel suck ass as the guy says. It is obvious and clear to anyone who really reads your stuff. Why, I remember...

No, the only bias I can say that you have is that you have a higher opinion of your Palm-alike than you should. iPaqs rule.

Ok, ok, I was just joking. You do have a slight bias towards AMD, whether because of the technology or other reasons it isn't really clear. But to accuse you of bias towards Intel is, well odd. There are some people who get religious about such things, this guy is one of them. For those that get religious about such things, you cannot be unbiased in their opinion unless you are just a cheerleader. And if you lead the cheers, you lose credibility. I think you are better off keeping your credibility.

AMD has some great technology, especially the stuff I remember correctly. Intel is hitting a rough spot because they took their eye off the ball and started dreaming about World Domination. But a lot of the contrast has more to do with Jerry rolling sevens and Craig rolling snake eyes, things could have very well worked out differently...



To: jcholewa who wrote (27369)2/5/2001 8:50:50 PM
From: Dan3Respond to of 275872
 
Re: If it is not the case that I am overly Intel-biased, then I am at a loss to respond to this email.

Rumor is, a handful of all the millions posting on the net, say 8 or 10, are not perfectly rational - I'd pay no attention to such nonsense. You shouldn't have dignified it with your question.

Regards,

Dan