Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Walliker who wrote (65328)	2/4/2001 1:11:23 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

John, This message comes courtesy of a very stable DDR machine with an upgraded memory module in the second slot. Scumbria

To: John Walliker who wrote (65328)	2/4/2001 4:12:39 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Hi John Walliker; Re radio frequency emissions and DDR... Since DDR is using a signal swing that is only half the amplitude of SDRAM, and is better terminated, don't you agree that DDR266 has simpler radio frequency problems than PC133 SDRAM? You had previously stated "it will be much harder to obtain CE approval for DDR designs because of radio frequency emissions". By this you were implying that DDR would have difficulty in these areas, as compared to RDRAM. But it is clear that DDR has less problems than SDRAM, and the SDRAM problems were obviously solved by industry. -- Carl