SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: russwinter who wrote (63295)2/4/2001 11:29:46 AM
From: Square_Dealings  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116764
 
russwinter:

And on the flip side, should the price of gold go up significantly, the profits picture changes rather quickly.

Fundamentally the odds are in favor of a weakening dollar/ increasing gold prices at this juncture. If I'm right a lot of boats will rise, some more than others.

Support on the downside is right where you would expect it, with prices close to forcing widespread mine shutdowns, yet just at a level where the operators can scrape by. If the CB's allow gold to fall so far as to shut down the mines then they are really screwed imo.

Maybe the mining co's already know this, but the absolute best thing to do for the price of gold right now would be to limit supply and close down half the mines.

M.



To: russwinter who wrote (63295)2/4/2001 3:00:14 PM
From: goldsheet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116764
 
> seven mines with cash costs well over $200. They are Dome 312K @ $202, La Coipa 220K @$212, Bald Mt 140K @ $223, South Deep 160K @ $204, Misima 245K @ $208, Kidston 230K @ $218, Granny Smith 265K @ $206

If $202/204/206/212 are well over 200, then I need a new calculator. They are definitely well under spot of $268 and will remain in production, since cash flow is over $50 positive.