Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (27421)	2/4/2001 8:33:51 PM
From: jjayxxxx	Respond to of 275872

RE: Itanic delays I never saw you bashing an AMDroid for repeating that the ITanic has been delayed !! You think I was bashing? I said bringing something up over and over again is childish. I said (essentially) being wrong is something other than childish. I thought I was being polite. I don't remember AMDroid bashing regarding Itanic delays (I typically only read this thread, and not all posts at that). But if someone were to claim that Itanic is currently late using an outdated target schedule as though that is BIG NEWS, then that's pretty childish. Or repeating that it is late over and over is also childish IMHO. According to your dumb logic, once it's delayed, it isn't newsworthy any more. "Dumb" insult aside, if that's the way you read it, then I must not have been clear enough. My intended point: once it is delayed, THAT is the ONE AND ONLY news event. Repeat it as much as you like, it is the same old news over and over. It can't actually miss THE SAME SCHEDULE over and over and over and over again just because someone brings it up ad nauseam. It if misses future revised schedules or deadlines, then that would be ANOTHER news event. Regardless, whether it is about Intel's or AMD's or anyone elses schedules, repeating the same news does not make it newsworthy. JJ