SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldsheet who wrote (63326)2/5/2001 3:07:45 AM
From: Gary H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116752
 
I hit the "ignore" button and it works just fine.
Goodbye Doug.



To: goldsheet who wrote (63326)2/5/2001 4:39:09 AM
From: W PAUL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116752
 
Dear Bob

I would welcome your view on the bambs message (63322) which got quickly submerged by GATA noise. My guess is that unless there is a widespread shift in demand for gold as an investment asset one or more big players would be taking too big a risk to bet against the Central Bank establishment which could well sell gold into a squeeze.

I can appreciate that eventually there will be a reduction in supply - although presumably the current price has partly been arrived at to make this a slow process.Whenever this might occur the Central Banks can still massage this transition. In the absence of an increased investment demand do you have a figure in your mind as to what this new equilibrium price would be ?

Thanks

Wyatt



To: goldsheet who wrote (63326)2/5/2001 9:41:13 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116752
 
Bob,
you keep telling us there is no manipulation, if so then why isn't Fox news or CNBC reporting this?
Message 15298507