SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: donald sew who wrote (41993)2/5/2001 11:01:11 AM
From: jtech  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
Im the biggest bear I know but Nothing goes down without a fight.
Xlk is getting ready to kick butt and take names.
Looking for $45 on xlk long.
One final leg up!



To: donald sew who wrote (41993)2/5/2001 11:34:00 AM
From: John Madarasz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42787
 
important to remember regarding RISING WEDGE BREAKDOWNS:

wedge breakdowns often roll-over into head & shoulder patterns....so be wary and on the lookout around failed rallies.

See: IIX, NDX, SOXX, XCI, XTC, XBD

Regards,

John M



To: donald sew who wrote (41993)2/5/2001 12:13:52 PM
From: Paul Shread  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
I've got the NDX back below its September 1 log downtrend line. And apologies to Allan, but I think I've got the NDX finding support on the lower boundary of its rising channel.

cache.wsrn.com



To: donald sew who wrote (41993)2/5/2001 12:33:59 PM
From: Paul Shread  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
COMPX is finding support at its Sept. 1 log downtrend line, and may be redrawing a steeper rising channel. The index's outperformance of the NDX is very interesting; buying may be expanding to the broader list.

cache.wsrn.com



To: donald sew who wrote (41993)2/5/2001 1:14:42 PM
From: Doo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
"What really surpises me where so many are calling this RISING WEDGE a BEARISH WEDGE is that its breaking an important rule where its just not rising on declining volume. This is just text-book stuff."

My sentiments exactly when I see knowlegeable folks ignore objective pattern drawing techniques and call small head and shoulders patterns things like "rectangles". <ggg>



To: donald sew who wrote (41993)2/5/2001 1:39:48 PM
From: Jan Crawley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
where its just not rising on declining volume.

Don, just in case that you are not aware of the following:

Started last week(not sure the exact day), the Naz stopped(drastically minimized) the so-call "double counting" method -- supposedly the double counting accounted for about 15% of the Naz volume(in the past).


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News