SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Pro Choice Action Team -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (11)2/5/2001 5:39:02 PM
From: YlangYlangBreeze  Respond to of 948
 
When I see where I would stand even here in "liberal California" I am really shaken.

Perpetuation of the myth that overturn of Roe v. Wade would not limit a woman's right to choose gives the same sense of false security as when our concerns for Roe v. Wade were pooh poohed during the election. But I don't think that there can be any doubt where the administration stands on that.

roevbush.com

Sorry for the partisan nature of this site, but it has a number of contact your representative and send a letter to the editor links.

(EDIT roevbush.com



To: Poet who wrote (11)2/6/2001 9:48:20 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 948
 
I commend those states for not passing additional laws when existing law prevails. As I said, I would expect abortion bans at maybe two states, that's all, if Roe is overturned.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News