Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : SEVU: New Invention of Great Potential... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (1459)	2/8/2001 10:20:07 AM
From: LaShark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1992

The confessions of a long, retracted Posted by: BillBranum Date: 2/7/2001 9:27:58 PM (ET) Post # of 5482 Yes, I’m back in I was wrong. I posted an immediate retraction about the exercise price of the warrants as soon as I read Rich’s response to my report and I verified the fact that the exercise price was $1.00, not $.01. I then sent an email to Rich quoting SEC filings why I still had concerns about stock transfers, and after receiving his email response, and a subsequent phone conversation, I realized I was wrong about the unaccounted shares. That’s when I posted the 2nd statement. Rich is catching a lot of flack on RB for using message boards. IMO, in the case he was entirely justified. The issues I raised were serious, and I was wrong. Such a public publication of the issues I raised DEMANDS an equally public rebuttal. Rich was entirely correct to address these issues in the way he did. I request that someone repost my 2nd statement (and this one if you want to) to SI. A@P reposted both Part 1 and Part 2 of my report on SI, but has not posted my subsequent posts. I would like to set the record straight there also. Bill Branum investorshub.com