SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SecularBull who wrote (125597)2/6/2001 1:52:20 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Do you think the AIDS-infected woman in the bolded paragraph below should be told where she might go to get a safe, legal abortion without the clinic losing funding for education, contraception, wellbaby clinics, antibiotics? Or should she be forced by the Bush policy to 1) bear the probably-infected child, if the birth happens before her death, or 2) choose abortion-with-a-stick in the bush?

You fairly radiate the smugness of the zealot, so I suspect that in your mental universe this is a yes or no question.

(Excerpts)

AT HOME ABROAD

Bush and AIDS, By ANTHONY LEWIS


...Every day about 15,000 are newly infected with
H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS.


.... As millions die
around the world, leaving millions of orphans —
as whole societies crumble — our moral
posture will be challenged. So will our economic
outlook, based as it is on global prosperity.

... George W. Bush, in his first major decision as
president, took an action that will increase the
spread of AIDS. That was his decision to deny
U.S. aid to family-planning organizations abroad
that inform women about medical options
including abortion.

Government funding of abortions abroad has
been prohibited by law since 1973. The Bush
rule says that clinics in developing countries
will lose U.S. funds if they even discuss
abortion with their patients.

What it means on the ground is this: A woman
who has AIDS comes to a clinic somewhere in
Africa or Asia. Drugs to prevent transmission
of the disease to newborn infants are not
available there. She desperately wants to avoid
bearing the child. But the doctor or nurse
cannot advise her on a safe, legal abortion if
the clinic wants to keep its American funds.


...The result? Families will not get
contraceptives. Without them, more people will
be infected with H.I.V. — and in due course
develop AIDS.

nytimes.com