SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zoltan! who wrote (125757)2/7/2001 7:48:37 AM
From: John Carragher  Respond to of 769667
 
What a difference a new administration makes towards using existing energy supplies. COAL vs eating up home owners natural gas.

Coal Plants Are Offered Grants
To Raise Efficiency, Cut Pollution

By JOHN J. FIALKA
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

WASHINGTON -- In a first step toward a Bush energy policy, the Energy
Department is offering $95 million in matching grants to quickly increase
efficiency and decrease pollution at coal-fired power plants.

Such plants, which provide 51% of the nation's electricity, were targets of
lawsuits and tougher air-pollution regulations under the Clinton
administration, which had the effect of discouraging the construction of new
plants and the modernization of older ones.

Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham indicated that enhancing the future of
coal-fired power is "certain to be part of a comprehensive national energy
policy" under the Bush administration. Funds for the grants program were
drawn from other agency research initiatives last fall by House and Senate
appropriations committees after California experienced the first signs of its
energy shortage, a department official said.

One of the program's priorities is to find technology that can quickly be fitted
on existing plants to increase generating efficiency. Conventional coal-fired
plants convert only about a third of the energy potential of coal into
electricity. The Energy Department is asking for proposals for increasing
generating efficiency by April 13.

The program aims to get more electricity from existing plants "without
getting swords crossed with environmental requirements," the official said.
Raising the energy-producing efficiency of coal-fired plants also would cut
down on pollution produced per unit of electricity, without the need to install
expensive antipollution equipment in older plants.

John Grasser, a vice president of the National Mining Association, said the
move toward more-efficient coal plants is "critical to the domestic coal
industry." But Frank O'Donnell, the head of the Clean Air Trust, a
Washington environmental group, was skeptical of the new program, noting
that coal burning produces a "whole galaxy of pollutants," including nitrogen
oxide, mercury, toxic metals, soot and carbon dioxide.

The new effort could use relatively inexpensive technologies, such as
changes in electronic controls that govern the combustion process, and
newer boilers to avoid "hot spots" that create nitrogen oxide, a common
ingredient of smog, the Energy Department official said.

Utilities frequently complain that resistance in local communities is among
the toughest hurdles to increasing generating capacity. Demonstrating that
coal-burning plants can operate more cleanly could help states get quicker
site approval for such plants, the official said.

Write to John J. Fialka at john.fialka@wsj.com



To: Zoltan! who wrote (125757)2/7/2001 9:24:28 AM
From: willcousa  Respond to of 769667
 
After the Elian debacle the cigars will be free - from Castro!



To: Zoltan! who wrote (125757)2/8/2001 2:23:31 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Dear Zoltan: The article expresses concern with Clinton "living there". I seriously doubt LIVING there is what Clinton has in mind. Now Cavorting there, that is a different matter and not covered in the rules. JDN