Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (65619)	2/7/2001 6:14:07 PM
From: Mike M2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Heinz, nice work. Perhaps GATA should organize a proxy fight so to speak. They could lobby shareholders to assign their votes to someone who is deemed worthy of the gold shareholder's trust ,friendly to gold , and strongly opposed to hedging. Unfortunately,it is likely a part of the gold cabals plan to acquire smaller mining shares at distress prices. It is infuriating that they benefit from the destruction which they have helped to create. mike

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (65619)	2/7/2001 10:56:39 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Heinz, I own ASA which I think has both of 'em, maybe more anglo. I'm thinking of just selling a good part of ASA and buying HGMCY -- I'm going to wait and see what ASA is getting ready to do first. I know part of their trying to amend the current restrictions has to do with this potential deal and I think they want to diversify as a result. I agree that hedging right now is dumb ... but don't know what influence I can have. Not being a direct shareholder I'm loathe to write, but good luck ...