SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Pro Choice Action Team -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DOUG H who wrote (267)2/7/2001 8:00:20 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 948
 
I appreciate your civility, too, Doug.

I want to point out that you had probably been (since so many fertilized eggs just depart with the menstrual flow) a "father" a number of times before the time that resulted in the positive pregnancy test occurred, and I suspect you don't, now, feel you have suffered the tragic loss of the deaths of several of your children.

I felt as you did, as soon as I knew I was pregnant, and so did my husband. We wanted a baby, though that first pregnancy hadn't been planned, and cost me a college education and changed the course of my life in some ways I regret. But when I had a miscarriage between my two children, although I was very sad (very), I knew I was not a mother whose child had died. In fact, such a notion is, to me, an unconscionable, cheap, self-dramatizing trivialization of the worst thing that can happen to a human being -- the loss of their child.

I was struck by this:

<< If a woman were to find out she were
pregnant and on the same day her boyfriend or hubby or whatever, were to slip some of this RU-486 into her system
via food or drink and the baby was lost as a result, I would consider that murder.>>

I would consider it a stunning, shocking assault, an invasion of that woman's body, and a vicious theft of her right to decide whether to gestate the embryo in her (not his, her) abdomen until it was a human being, their child.