Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JACK R. SMITH JR. who wrote (13493)	2/7/2001 10:56:06 PM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 14226

Water was changed to wine, can a vinegary change to water? there is a way for global's shareholders like i & thor to have justice delivered as pertains to investment, obtain shareholder value to obtain that return from a selling gpgi shares buy low & sell high yes, but two things are required in my opinion (1) global's dirt is good dirt (allows extraction) (2) above justice only for investments of shareholders the above (2) implies no action will be taken against Jensen or Twitford that has as purpose to confront their past and present activities as being for or against shareholde value from this we are able to proceed from an assumption that (1) is True, as in global's dirt contains precious metals in enough quanity and in a manner that the metals can be extracted in quanity at a price that will make this company successful as in creating the types of revenue hoped for in a "gold mine." my suggestion is based on the fact that many including i would greatly welcome a legal action towards the management of global such that they are removed and hopefully charged and found guilty of criminal crimes yes, but in my opinion unless that is done with great care that requires resources both to attack and defend from that which will counter us with their counter attack, unless we all agree to make this a long costly battle that will tap and suck much from us all time and money with no clear time table or final judgement results, then if started we would not only fail, but Jensen with actually obtain a win at the expense of us providing his win results at our expense. if my above comments ring true or possible then where do we hurting shareholder stand or better yet what can we do so that Jensen does not screw us as we think he has and will continue to? to me its the above (1) + (2) lets assume (1) is False no precious metals will ever be extracted from the dirt if so then no one wins in terms of investment's huge reward no riches to be made investment lost Jensen & Twitford continue job security for years to come but they never deliver their aDream to themselves and to me that all i need to know and i will not carry hate to see them suffer & hurt just knowing they did not win the good dirt is all thats important to myself ok, but lets assume the dirt is good doing (1) now allow (2) which excludes "revenge, hate, etc." i have posted more than many times about jenSin crime being working against shareholder value especially with him only allowing a twiTurd solution that started from day 1 long before i did a buy of gpgi to do (1) & (2) requires us to accept dirt is not good and in the end no one wins and Jensen et al not taken to court please re read above sentence as now to do in my opinion is wait for jenSin & twiTurd to make global successful if they do, then we got good dirt w/ extraction and with extraction of the dirt implies revenue which is money which is what we claim w/ damages against Jensen Note: This requires that we accept the possibility that Global's dirt is good in all ways such that if we were able to expell jenSin & twiTurd today and obtain proof of good dirt that we could quickly make a deal good for all and bring in new people that will obtain salaries from them being successful through them receiving paychecks in gpgi shares given to them not below market best Ask price. The above Note is very important since it includes the possibility that if we wait for Jensen to make Global successful, he may not even do that with the dirt being good. Ineffect same end result if the dirt was bad. For me i see nothing showing me the time and resources from shareholders to do it correctly at their time and expense. Hire a sleeze lawyer and shot yourself in foot. To me we wait for Global to become successful, then we move in and extract jenSin & twiTurd. If anyone know the dirt is good and knows that this good dirt can be taken to a conclusion such that money is made as hoped for, and you also wish not to wait for Jensen and Twitford to deliver success, then speak up and give plan. doug

To: JACK R. SMITH JR. who wrote (13493)	2/13/2001 3:51:23 AM
From: Thor Carlsen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

Hey Jack even though the guy is wrong most of the time all 3200 shareholders are still in the same floundering boat. You know it's over. I know it's over. Do you think they think it's over? You said before you had owned .001 stocks. Can you enlighten us on how a captain scuttles his ship... Thor

To: JACK R. SMITH JR. who wrote (13493)	2/14/2001 12:03:02 PM
From: Thor Carlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Jack, looks like I am leaving the thread. XTCI is UP $$$$$. Formerly MGAU now XTCI is shooting for the roof and with them we won't need GPGI. Loading up on that XTCI has now made me real comfy with profit. GPGI and even the majors are done so GPGI will be lost in the carnage.... No one will now listen to a pink when the majors will fail. It's not too late to buy XTCI and make up for the loss here. See you around Jack.